INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURAL REFORM BY IMPLEMENTING THE DIGITAL GOVERNANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56362/Rev2299035NKeywords:
structural reform, digital governance, sustainable development, digital advocacyAbstract
The structural reform strategy is a major driver for modernizing and developing the work system of institutions and raising their abilities for resilience and flexibility in facing local and international challenges and variables to achieve the sustainable development goals. In this context, the study presents the broad features of the components of structural reform as a major driver towards sustainable development with a global perspective to meet the requirements of sustainable development, as an evolution of the New Public Management perspective as a model for administrative reform. This paper deals with contemporary trends in public administration towards structural reform of institutions and digital governance to face local and international changes and challenges, which look to contribute to achieving sustainable development.
References
Abdel Moneim Al-Mashat, Salwa Thabet Makki, Arab Food Security: Management by Initiative, Arab Journal of Management, Arab Administrative Development Organization, No. 3, Vol. 40, 2021, p.216.
Ahmed Ashour, Arnia Al-Mashat, Egypt is the first in the Arab world in the ESCWA report on sustainable development goals platforms, Al-Mal Newspaper, October 27, 2020., p.57-59.
Almashat, Abdulmonem and Salwa Thabet (2019), State Survival Bureaucracy (SSB): State Sustainability after Arab Revolutions”, Review of Economics and Political Science, Emerald Publishing, Vol. 4, No.2. p.192.
Andersen, Lote, Andreas Boesen and Len Holm Pedersen (2016), Performance in Public Organization: Clarifying the Conceptual Space, Public Administration Review, Vol. 76, No. 6:29.
Easton, D. (1957). An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems, World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, p.98.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2019), Transition Report 2019-2020, Better Governance, Better Economies, p.31-35.
European Commission (2020), Structural Reform for Economic Growth, p.18-20.
Global Innovation Index, 2020, p.142-144.
Grueling, G. (2001), Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, Vol 4, No. 1: 29.
Hood, C. (1995), The New Public Management in 1980s: Variations on theme, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2-3:214.
Laurent, Victor and Steven Vun de Walle (2020), The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services, Governance, Vol. 33, No. 3, p.117-119.
Mc.Nabb, David E. (2010), Research Methods for Political Science, Routledge, New York, USA, p. 107.
Mattocks, Carolyn (2016), New Trends in Public Administration: Reflecting on Challenges and Harnessing Opportunities, American Society for Public Administration, p.26-27.
Orvis, S. and Drogues, C. (2013). Introducing comparative politics: Concepts and cases in context, 3.rd. Edition, Sage Publications Ltd, Canada, p.316-318.
Pollitt, C. and Dan S. (2011), The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A Meta-Analysis, 173-174.
Scandura, A. and Williams A. (2000), Research Methodology in Management: Current Practices, Trends and Implications for Future Research, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 6, p.186.
State Information Service, Tourism Sector, Journal Your Gateway to Egypt, June 10, 2020, p.65-67.
The World Bank in Egypt, 2020, p.47.
The Digital Governance Initiative (2020), Digital Governance Concept, p. 104-107.
United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, United Nations Development Program in the Arab Countries, 2019, p.61-62.
World Bank (2020), Institutional and Structural Reforms for a Stronger and More Inclusive Recovery, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, p.56.
World Economic Forum (2020), How Digitalization and Innovation Can Make the Post-Covid World a Better Place, p.81.
