Assurance and Advice Instead of Defense: A Comparative Review of the IIA Three Lines Documents of 2013, 2020 and 2026

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev26114.03R

Keywords:

three lines model, corporate governance, internal audit, assurance, independence

Abstract

The paper compares three Institute of Internal Auditors documents defining the roles of the board,
management and internal audit: the 2013 Position Paper, the 2020 Three Lines Model and the 2026 Statement of Position. A qualitative comparative analysis of terminology, structure and principles is applied. The results show a shift from a defense metaphor to a governance model, the separation of assurance from advice, the operationalization of independence and the acceptance of role overlap under documented safeguards. The three-part structure remains unchanged, while its application evolves.

References

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2013). Position Paper: The Three Lines of Defense in Effective Risk Management and Control. Altamonte Springs, FL: IIA.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) / Croatian Institute of Internal Auditors (HIIR). (2020). Three Lines Model – Update of the Three Lines of Defense Model. Lake Mary, FL: IIA. (Adaptation, July 2020.)

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2026). Assurance and Advice in Support of Effective Governance – Three Lines Model, Statement of Position. Lake Mary, FL: IIA

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Jeremić, N. (2026). Assurance and Advice Instead of Defense: A Comparative Review of the IIA Three Lines Documents of 2013, 2020 and 2026. REVIZOR * Journal of Organizational Management, Finance and Auditing, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev26114.03R

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>