The Role of Responsible Leadership in Post-Retirement Disengagement: A Comparative Study Between the UK and Serbia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev25112.119V

Keywords:

responsible leadership, post-retirement disengagement, aging population, retirement policies, financial vulnerability

Abstract

The rapidly aging populations in Serbia, and the UK present significant socio-economic challenges, particularly in retirement. While retirement theoretically offers rest and financial security, many retirees in these countries face heightened social isolation and financial vulnerability. Disengagement from the workforce often leads to a loss of purpose and underutilization of silver talent, exacerbating financial instability. This study addresses these dual challenges by exploring how re-engagement in social and economic activities can mitigate their impact. It assesses the effectiveness of existing retirement policies and proposes strategies for better integrating retirees into society and the workforce to improve their quality of life.

References

Balestra, C., & Tonkin, R. (2018). Inequalities in household wealth across OECD countries: Evidence from the OECD Wealth Distribution Database. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2018/01.

Bienstman, S., Hense, S., & Gangl, M. (2024). How income inequality threatens democracy: The role of perceived fairness and political trust. Journal of Social Policy.

Coram, V. (2022). Perceptions of intergenerational inequality in policymaking. Journal of Intergenerational Justice.

Dorling, D. (2019). Inequality and the 1% (2nd ed.). Verso.

FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies. (2024). Inequality and populism: Understanding the drivers of political discontent. FEPS Policy Study.

Government of the Republic of Serbia. (2023). Strategy for active and healthy ageing in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2024–2030. https://www.minbpd.gov.rs

Grasso, M., & Giugni, M. (2025). Intersectionality and inequalities in political participation in Europe. European Political Science Review.

Isbell, T. (2024). Perceived (in)equality and demand for democracy in Africa. Afrobarometer Working Paper.

López, M., & Dubrow, J. K. (2020). Politics and inequality in comparative perspective. Routledge.

Loveless, M. (2024/2025). Perceptions of inequality and political participation: Why subjective evaluations matter. Comparative Political Studies.

Merten, L., & Niedringhaus, J. (2024). Perceived inequality and affective polarization. Political Behavior.

OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. OECD Publishing.

Office for National Statistics. (2023). Living longer: The UK’s ageing population. https://www.ons.gov.uk

Pew Research Center. (2025). Global perceptions of inequality and discrimination. Pew Research Center.

Rodríguez-Pose, A., Terrero-Dávila, J., & Lee, N. (2023). Left-behind versus unequal places: Economic decline, inequality, and support for populism. Journal of Economic Geography.

World Bank. (2023). Populism, inequality and economic growth. World Bank Policy Report.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Vysotskaya, A., Djurić, Z., Beke-Trivunac, J., Madžar, L., & Joksimović, M. (2026). The Role of Responsible Leadership in Post-Retirement Disengagement: A Comparative Study Between the UK and Serbia. REVIZOR * Journal of Organizational Management, Finance and Auditing, 28(4 (112). https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev25112.119V

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>