Performance Analysis of Public Enterprises in Serbia Based on PIPRECIA-S and MARCOS Methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev25110.001L

Keywords:

public enterprises, performance analysis, PIPRECIA-S, MARCOS, Serbia

Abstract

By their nature, the operations of public enterprises are specific, as they provide services to both citizens and other entities. Evaluating their performance is a challenging, complex, and significant task. This study analyzes the performance of public enterprises in Serbia using two multi-criteria decision-making methods: PIPRECIA-S and MARCOS. The results indicate that the top five public enterprises in terms of performance are: JP Putevi Srbije Beograd, JP Srbijagas Novi Sad, JP Pošta Srbije Beograd, Javno preduzeće za gazdovanje šuma “Srbijašume” sa p.o. Beograd, and JKP Beogradski vodovod i kanalizacija Beograd. The best-performing company is JP Putevi Srbije Beograd, while the lowest-ranked is JVP Srbijavode Beograd. The performance of public enterprises in Serbia can be improved through more efficient management of business assets, capital, losses, revenues, net results, and human resources. This requires adequate adaptation to the highly dynamic and complex business environment.

References

Anastassiou, Th., and Doumpos, M (2000). Multicriteria evaluation of the performance of public enterprises: the case of Greece. Investigaciones Europeas, 6(3), 11-24.

Aytekin, A. (2022). Determining criteria weights for vehicle tracking system selection using PIPRECIA-S. Journal of process management and new technologies, 10(1-2), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt10-38145

Corrêa, T.L., Morais, D.C.(2024). Private Partner Prioritization for Public–Private Partnership Contracts in a Brazilian Water Company Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method. Mathematics, 12(13),2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12132041

Đalić, I., Stević, Ž., Erceg, Ž., Macura, P., & Terzić, S. (2020). Selection of a distribution channel using the integrated FUCOM-MARCOS model. International Review, 3-4, 80-96. https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev2003080Q

Ersoy, N. (2017). Performance measurement in the retail industry by using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Ege Academic Review, 17(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2017431302

Kovač, M., Tadić, S., Krstić, M. and Bouarima, M.B. (2021). Novel Spherical Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Assessment of Drone-Based City Logistics Concepts. WILEY Hindawi Complexity Volume 2021, Article ID 2374955, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2374955

Lukic, R.(2022a). Application of MARCOS method in the evaluation of efficiency of trade companies in Serbia. Ekonomski pogledi – Economic Outlook, Vol. 24, No. 1/2022 pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.5937/ep24-38921

Lukic, R. (2022b). Application of the MARCOS Method in Analysis of the Positioning of Electronic Trade of the European Union and Serbia. Informatica Economică, vol. 26, no. 3/2022, 50-63. DOI: 10.24818/issn14531305/26.3.2022.05

Lukić, R. (2022c). Analysis of financial performance and efficiency of banks in Serbia using fuzzy LMAW and MARCOS methods. Bankarstvo – Banking, 4, 130-169. DOI: 10.5937/bankarstvo2204130L

Lukić, R. (2023a). Measurement and Analysis of The Information Performance of Companies in The European Union and Serbia Based on The Fuzzy LMAW and MARCOS Methods. Informatica Economică vol. 27, no. 1, 17 – 31. DOI: 10.24818/issn14531305/27.1.2023.02

Lukić, R. (2023b). Comparative analysis of transport and storage information systems of the European Union and Serbia using fuzzy LMAW and MARCOS methods. Economy, Business & Development, 4(1). 1-17DOI: 10.47063/ebd.00011

Lukic, R. (2023c). Merenje i analiza dinamike profitabilnosti bankarskog sektora u Srbiji na bazi FLMAW-MARCOS metoda. Measurement and Analysis of Profitability Dynamics of the Banking Sector in Serbia Based on the FLMAW-MARCOS Method. Banking – Bankarstvo, 4, 8-47. DOI: 10.5937/bankarstvo2301028L

Mirčetić, V., Popović, G. and Vukotić, S. (2024). Unveiling the characteristics of the EU charismatic leaders using the PIPRECIA-S method. Journal of process management and new technologies, 12(1-2), 99-109. Doi: 10.5937/jpmnt12-51159

Miškić S, Stević, Ž, Tanackov, I. (2021). A novel integrated SWARA-MARCOS model for inventory classification. IJIEPR., 32 (4), 1-17. URL: http://ijiepr.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1243-en.html

Mladenović, M., Đukić, T., & Popović, G. (2023). Analysis of financial reporting platforms based on the PIPRECIA-S Method. Journal of process management and new technologies, 11(3- 4), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt11-48186

Moskovics, P., Wanke, P., Tan, Y., & Gerged, A. M. (2024). Market structure, ESG performance, and corporate efficiency: Insights from Brazilian publicly traded companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3492

Nedeljković, M, Puška, A, Doljanica, S, Virijević Jovanović, S, Brzaković, P, Stević, Ž, et al. (2021). Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA – Fuzzy MABAC model. PLoS ONE, 16(2): e0246857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246857

Possebon, E.A.G., Cippiciani, F.A., Savoia, J.R.F., de Mariz, F. (2024). ESG Scores and Performance in Brazilian Public Companies. Sustainability, 16(13),5650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135650

Poudel, S. P. . (2023). Financial Performance Analysis of Public Enterprises (PEs) in Nepal. Voice of Teacher, 8(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3126/vot.v8i1.60865

Puška, A. , Stević, Ž., Stojanović, I (2021). Selection of Sustainable Suppliers Using the Fuzzy MARCOS Method. Current Chinese Science, 1(2), 218-229. https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210298101999201109214028

Setiawansyah, S., Sintaro, S., Saputra, V. H., & Aldino, A. A. (2024). Combination of Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA-S) in Determining the Best Staff. Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science, 2(2), 57-66.

Sidki, M., Boerger, L. & Boll, D. (2024). The effect of board members’ education and experience on the financial performance of German state-owned enterprises. J Manag Gov 28, 445–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09663-4

Stanujkić, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabašević, D., Smarandache, F., & Turskis, Z. (2017). The use of the pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment method for determining the weights of criteria. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 20(4), 116-133.

Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., & Sava, C. (2021). Simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) method. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 24(4), 141.

Stević, Ž.; Brković, N. A. (2020). Novel Integrated FUCOM-MARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company. Logistics, 4, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4010004

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A. and Chatterjee, P. (2020a). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to Compromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231.

Sulistiani, H., Palupiningsih, P., Hamidy, F., Sari, P. L., & Khairunnisa, Y. (2023, November). Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution. In 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS) (pp. 369-373). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017

Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M. and Pamučar, D. (2020). New Fazzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, MDPI,8, 457, 181-198.

Trung, Do Duc. (2021). Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA, and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process. Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 71(2), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2021-0019

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Lukić, R. (2025). Performance Analysis of Public Enterprises in Serbia Based on PIPRECIA-S and MARCOS Methods. REVIZOR, 28(2 (110). https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev25110.001L