Izbor studijskog programa korišćenjem metode višekriterijumskog odlučivanja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev25111.089AKljučne reči:
studijski program, višekriterijumsko odlučivanje, AHP (Analytical Hierar- chical Process), TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution)Apstrakt
Tokom života, jedna od najbitnijih odluka koje osoba donosi odnosi se na izbor visokoškolske ustanove, na kojoj će studirati. Ovaj izbor zavisi od velikog broja faktora, a neki od njih se odnose na uspeh tokom prethodnog školovanja, kao i rezultata prijemnih
ispita, mogućnosti upisa na budžet, mogućnosti zaposlenja, prestiža i drugo. Cilj ovog rada je da odredi optimalan studijski program koristeći kriterijume koji utiču na izbor studijskog programa i kriterijume i odnose alternativa. U radu je prvenstveno opisano višekriterijumsko odlučivanje, a potom detaljno opisane metode koje su korišćene u ovom istraživanju: AHP i TOPSIS. Nakon toga su navedene metode primenjene na konkretnom primeru, koje imaju za cilj pravi izbor studijskog programa. Težine kriterijuma su određene sprovođenjem ankete u kojoj je učestvovalo 100 studenata sa dva fakulteta: Fakultet za hotelijerstvo i turizam u Vrnjačkoj Banji (studijski programi: Turizam i hotelijerstvo i Gastronomija) i Ekonomski fakultet u Kragujevcu (studijski programi: Ekonomija i poslovno upravljanje i Poslovna informatika). Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da je kriterijum sa najvećom težinom mogućnost upisa na budžet, a najbolje rangiram studijski program Turizam i hotelijerstvo sa Fakulteta za hotelijerstvo i turizam u Vrnjačkoj Banji, Univerziteta u Kragujevcu. Rezultati ovog istraživanja upotpunjuju kako domaću, tako i inostranu literaturu kada se govori o korišćenju metoda za višekriterijumsko odlučivanje.
Reference
Adem Esmail, B., & Geneletti, D. (2018). Multi‐criteria decision analysis for nature conservation: A review of 20 years of applications. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 42-53.
Al-Tarawneh, H. A. (2012). The main factors beyond decision-making. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1-23.
Amudha, M., Ramachandran, M., Saravanan, V., Anusuya, P., & Gayathri, R. (2021). A study on TOPSIS MCDM techniques and its application. Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 09-14.
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31-43.
Blešić, I., Petrović, M. D., Gajić, T., Tretiakova, T., Vujičić, M., & Syromiatnikova, J. (2021). Application of the analytic hierarchy process in the selection of traditional food criteria in Vojvodina (Serbia). Journal of Ethnic Foods, 8(1), 20.
Bouramdane, A. A. (2023). Cyberattacks in smart grids: challenges and solving the multi-criteria decision-making for cybersecurity options, including ones that incorporate artificial intelligence, using an analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(4), 662-705.
Bulgurcu, B. K. (2012). Application of TOPSIS technique for financial performance evaluation of technology firms in Istanbul stock exchange market. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 62, 1033-1040.
Byun, H. S., & Lee, K. H. (2005). A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(11), 1338-1347.
Ceballos, B., Lamata, M. T., & Pelta, D. A. (2016). A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Progress in artificial intelligence, 5(4), 315-322.
Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020). An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281-300.
Čupić, M., & Suković, M. (1994). Višekriterijumsko odlučivanje, metode i primeri. Beograd: Univerzitet “Braća Karić”.
Das, S., Sarkar, S., & Kanungo, D. P. (2022). GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in parts of Kalimpong Region of Darjeeling Himalaya. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(4), 234.
de Oliveira, B. R., & Duarte, M. A. Q. (2024). Automatic and semi-automatic analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Trends in Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, e240009-e240009.
Dean, M. (2022). A practical guide to multi-criteria analysis. UCL: London, UK, 33, 142.
Dodgson, J., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., & Phillips, L. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
Fahmi, A. (2023). Particle swarm optimization selection based on the TOPSIS technique. Soft Computing, 27(14), 9225-9245.
Gajjar, N. B. (2013). Factors affecting consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 10-15.
Ginting, G., Fadlina, M., Siahaan, A. P. U., & Rahim, R. (2017). Technical approach of TOPSIS in decision making. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res, 3(8), 58-64.
Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., & Harker, P. T. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process. Applications and Studies, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2(1), 1-273.
Gülsün, B., & Miç, P. (2019). Multi-Criteria decision making and the choice of university in education. International Journal of Business Tourism and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 32-38.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186, Berlin: Springer-Verlag Publishing.
Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. John Wiley & Sons.
Karim, R., & Karmaker, C. L. (2016). Machine selection by AHP and TOPSIS methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 7-13.
Knežević, S. P., Mandić, K., Mitrović, A., Dmitrović, V., Delibašić, B. (2017). An FAHP-TOPSIS Framework for Analysis of the Employee Productivity in the Serbian Electrical Power Companies. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 22(2), 47-60.
Knežević, S., Bogojević, Arsić, V., Milojević, S., Mitrović, A. (2023). Oblikovanje budućnosti računovodstvene profesije u skladu sa tehnološkim napretkom i osvrt na STEM polje, Revizor – Časopis za upravljanje organizacijama, finansijse i reviziju, 104(4), 17-28.
Kousar, S., Ansar, A., Kausar, N., & Freen, G. (2025). Multi-criteria decision-making for smog mitigation: a comprehensive analysis of health, economic, and ecological impacts. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 2(1), 53-67.
Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10, 101954.
Macoun, P., & Prabhu, R. (1999). Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators (Vol. 9). CIFOR.
Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M. S. (2007). Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 30(1), 333-338.
Marttunen, M., Lienert, J., & Belton, V. (2017). Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. European journal of operational research, 263(1), 1-17.
Melese, T., & Belay, T. (2022). Groundwater potential zone mapping using analytical hierarchy process and GIS in Muga Watershed, Abay Basin, Ethiopia. Global Challenges, 6(1), 2100068.
Nikolić, J. (2018). Predrasude u procesu odlučivanja i mogućnosti njihovog prevazilaženja. Ekonomski horizonti,
(2), 45-59.
Nikolić, M. (2012). Metode odlučivanja. Zrenjanin; Tehnički fakultet „Mihajlo Pupin“.
Panchal, S., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2022). Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study of National Highway 5 in India. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101626.
Pande, C. B., Moharir, K. N., Panneerselvam, B., Singh, S. K., Elbeltagi, A., Pham, Q. B., ... & Rajesh, J. (2021). Delineation of groundwater potential zones for sustainable development and planning using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and MIF techniques. Applied Water Science, 11(12), 186.
Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., & Sharma, H. K. (2022). Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: a review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1206.
Parsian, S., Amani, M., Moghimi, A., Ghorbanian, A., & Mahdavi, S. (2021). Flood hazard mapping using fuzzy logic, analytical hierarchy process, and multi-source geospatial datasets. Remote Sensing, 13(23), 4761.
Pivac, J., Štimac, I., Barić, D., & Boc, K. (2024). Analiza primjene metode analitičkog hijerarhijskog procesa u vrednovanju učinkovitosti i kvalitete usluge putničkog terminala zračne luke. In 25. međunarodni simpozij o kvaliteti” Kvaliteta-jučer, danas, sutra” (pp. 1-14).
Raja, S., John Rajan, A., Praveen Kumar, V., Rajeswari, N., Girija, M., Modak, S., ... & Mammo, W. D. (2022). Selection of additive manufacturing machine using analytical hierarchy process. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 1596590.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process (Vol. 282). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
Saaty, T. L., Zoffer, H. J., Vargas, L. G., & Guiora, A. (2021). The analytic hierarchy process: beyond “getting to yes” in conflict resolution. In Overcoming the Retributive Nature of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (pp. 17-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Sadana, U., Chenreddy, A., Delage, E., Forel, A., Frejinger, E., & Vidal, T. (2025). A survey of contextual optimization methods for decision-making under uncertainty. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, 320(2), 271-289.
Salomon, V. A. P., & Gomes, L. F. A. M. (2024). Consistency improvement in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematics, 12(6), 828.
Sampath, B., Sasikumar, C., & Myilsamy, S. (2023). Application of TOPSIS optimization technique in the micro-machining process. In Trends, paradigms, and advances in mechatronics engineering (pp. 162-187). IGI global.
Sarkar, A. (2013). A TOPSIS method to evaluate the technologies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(1), 2-13.
Schmidt, K., Aumann, I., Hollander, I., Damm, K., & von der Schulenburg, J. M. G. (2015). Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 15(1), 112.
Shukla, A., Agarwal, P., Rana, R. S., & Purohit, R. (2017). Applications of TOPSIS algorithm on various manufacturing processes: a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(4), 5320-5329.
Srđević, B., Suvočarev, K., & Srđević, Z. (2009). Analitički hijerarhijski proces: Individualna i grupna konzistentnost donosilaca odluka. Vodoprivreda, 41(1-3), 13-21.
Stofkova, J., Krejnus, M., Stofkova, K. R., Malega, P., & Binasova, V. (2022). Use of the analytic hierarchy process and selected methods in the managerial decision-making process in the context of sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(18), 11546.
Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process: Revolution and evolution. Annals of operations research, 326(2), 879-907.
Thakkar, J. J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making (Vol. 336, pp. 1-365). Springer.
Thakur, P., Kizielewicz, B., Gandotra, N., Shekhovtsov, A., Saini, N., Saeid, A. B., & Sałabun, W. (2021). A new entropy measurement for the analysis of uncertain data in mcda problems using intuitionistic fuzzy sets and copras method. Axioms, 10(4), 335.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision-making methods. In Multi-criteria decision-making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5-21). Springer, Boston, MA.
Uzun, B., Taiwo, M., Syidanova, A., & Uzun Ozsahin, D. (2021). The technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). In Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental and civil engineering (pp. 25-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Vavrek, R. (2019). Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18(06), 1821-1843.
Więckowski, J., & Szyjewski, Z. (2022). Practical study of selected multi-criteria methods comparison. Procedia Computer Science, 207 , 4565-4573.
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and economic development of economy, 20(1), 165-179.
Zlaugotne, B., Zihare, L., Balode, L., Kalnbalkite, A., Khabdullin, A., & Blumberga, D. (2020). Multi-criteria decision analysis methods comparison. Rigas Tehniskas Universitates Zinatniskie Raksti, 24(1), 454-471.
Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 229-246.
