Organizacije Evropske Unije – glavni akteri u sprovođenju politike održivosti životne sredine

Autori

  • Asmaeil Ali Mohammed Khmaaj Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Biljana Ilić Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Zorica Đurić Alfa BK University, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-0635

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46793/Rev24108201K

Ključne reči:

Održivi razvoj, održive dimenzije, organizacije EU, politika zaštite

Apstrakt

Održivi razvoj predstavlja složen, višedimenzionalan koncept, koji u savremenim uslovima poslovanja dobija na vrednosti, postajući jedna od bitnih tematika diskusije među naučnicima. Održivi razvoj počiva na tri stuba koji su međuzavisni i povezani – ekonomija, društvo i ekologija. Ekonomski stub se odnosi na smanjenje negativnih efekata ekonomije obima, i na njen smanjeni ekološki otisak na životnu sredinu. Društvena dimenzija održivosti počiva na društvenoj jednakosti i kvalitetu ljudskog života. Ekološka dimenzija, kao najvažnija, odnosi se na zaštitu prirodne sredine u najvećoj mogućoj meri, u cilju ublažavanja klimatskih promena i očuvanja Planete. Postoje mnogobrojni činioci na platformi održivosti i razvoja, odnosno organizacije koje imaju za cilj da vrše promociju održivog ponašanja, i streme ka predviđenim ciljevima, zarad dostizanja dobrobiti i blagodeti za ćitavu društvenu zajednicu. Rad se bavi prikazom organizacija ili institucija koje čiji su glavni zadaci kreiranje politike koja štiti životnu sredinu, obzirom na činjenicu da je suštinska svrha koncepta održivosti proizašla upravo iz potrebe zaštite prirodnih resursa. U radu će se kroz uporednu analizu prikazati funkcionisanje Evropskog parlamenta, jedne od najvažnijih institucija EU, ali i ostalih institucija od značaja za sprovođenje i kreiranje plitičkih scenarija i upravljanja u pravcu zaštite prirodnih resursa, odnosno prirodnih bogatstava.

Reference

Alesina, A. F., & Grilli, V. U. (1991). The European central bank: Reshaping monetary politics in Europe

Bobek, M. (2015). The court of justice of the European Union. The Oxford Handbook of EU Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 153-177

Broman, G. I., & Robèrt, K. H. (2017). A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 17-31

Cameron, J., & Abouchar, J. (1991). The precautionary principle: a fundamental principle of law and policy for the protection of the global environment. BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 14, 1

Caspersen, O. (1999). The European Environment Agency. Global Environmental Change, 9(1), 71-75

Claes, M., & de Witte, B. (2016). Competences: codification and contestation. In Research Handbook on EU institutional law (pp. 46-87). Edward Elgar Publishing

Classic political Economy. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_7479/objava_41800/fajlovi/

Clifton, J., Díaz‐Fuentes, D., & Gómez, A. L. (2018). The European investment bank: Development, integration, investment?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 733-750

Craig, P. (2016). EU competences. A Companion to European Union Law and International Law, 81-94

Daly, H. E. (2007). Ecological economics and sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing

De Schoutheete, P., & Wallace, H. S. (2002). The European Council. Paris: Notre Europe

European Environment Agency. 2003. EEA Strategy 2004-2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

Fanghella, P. D. P., & Catone, T. (2011). The CLP Regulation: origin, scope, and evolution. Annali dell’Istituto superiore di sanità, 47, 126-131.;Petry, T., Knowles, R., & Meads, R. (2006). An analysis of the proposed REACH regulation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44(1), 24-32

Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007). Introduction: contested competencies in the European Union. West European Politics, 30(2), 227-243

Franklin, M. N., Van der Eijk, C., & Marsh, M. (2012). Referendum outcomes and trust in government: Public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. In The Crisis of Representation in Europe (pp. 101-117). Routledge

Goodstein, E.S. (2003). Economics and environment. Mate, Zagreb, Croatia

Hafner, P. (2009). Ecological paradigm and economic reality.Facta universitatis -series: Economics and Organization, 6(2), 115-122

Hartmann, P., & Smets, F. (2018). The first twenty years of the European Central Bank: monetary policy

Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2013). Empowerment of the European parliament. Annual review of political science, 16(1), 171-189

Jacobs, F. (2014). The European Parliament. In Reforming the European Union (pp. 57-73). Routledge

Jevtić, D. (2004). European Union environmental policy. Student’s works. In the Proceedings of CEPIT Participants of Virtual Courses (pp. 222-232). Belgrade Open School. https://www.bos.rs/en/uploaded/TranzicijaGlobalizacijaEvropskeintegracije.PDF#page=228

Kelemen, R. D. (2016). The Court of Justice of the European Union in the twenty-first century. Law & Contemp. Probs., 79, 117

Lewis, J. (2014). The Council of the European Union and the European Council. In Routledge Handbook of European politics (pp. 219-234). Routledge.

Ludlow, P. (2018). The European Commission. In The New European Community (pp. 85-132). Routledge

Łyko, J., & Łyko, E. (2020). The composition of the European Parliament during the 2019–2024 term in light of legal provisions and the rules of fair distribution. In Eurasian Economic Perspectives: Proceedings of the 26th and 27th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conferences (pp. 363-374). Springer International Publishing

Micossi, S. (2015). The monetary policy of the European Central Bank (2002-2015). CEPS Special Report, 109.

Monod, T. (1973). Ward, B. & Dubos, R. Only One Earth. The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet (An Unofficial Report Commissioned by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Prepared with the assistance of a 152-member Committee of Corresponding Consultants in 58 Countries, New York, WAV. Norton & Co., 1972. Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie), 27(1), 177-178

Noel, E. (1993). Working together--the institutions of the European Community. European Documentation 1993

Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2019). The ‘political’roles of the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 203-220

Pivašević, J. M., & Hafner, P. (2013). The institutional dimension of sustainable development. International Journal of Economic Practice and Policy, (3-4), 119-128

Powers, S. (1992). Statistical needs in Eastern Europe. Monthly Labor Review, 115(3), 18-28

Raiser, M. (1997). Informal institutions, social capital and economic transition: reflections on a neglected dimension (Vol. 25). London: EBRD

Schütze, R. (2015). EU COMPETENCES. The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, 75

United Nations Environment Programme. International Resource Panel, United Nations Environment Programme. Sustainable Consumption, & Production Branch. (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. UNEP/Earthprint

World Conservation Strategy. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2024-12-31

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Articles